Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
São Paulo med. j ; 140(1): 42-55, Jan.-Feb. 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1357468

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Maintenance of oral microbiota balance is the simplest way to prevent infectious oral diseases, through controlling dental biofilm. Combined use of mouthwash and mechanical removal has been shown to be a very effective way for this. OBJECTIVES: To identify clinical studies comparing the antimicrobial effect and possible adverse effects and/or side effects of chlorhexidine-based mouthwashes with those of mouthwashes containing chlorine dioxide and/or polyhexanide, for controlling oral microbiota. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review designed by the stomatology sector of postgraduation in applied dental sciences of Bauru Dentistry School, University of São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using online databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Science Direct) up to April 8, 2020. The search was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: The studies included comprised eight articles published between 2001 and 2017. A total of 295 young adults, adults and elderly people were evaluated (males 44.75% and females 55.25%). Three articles compared polyhexanide with chlorhexidine and five articles compared chlorine dioxide with chlorhexidine. No studies comparing all three mouthwashes were found. The concentrations of the study solutions were quite varied, and all rinses had an antimicrobial effect. In four studies, it was stated that no side effects or adverse effects had been found. Three studies did not address these results and only one study addressed side effects and/or adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Mouthwashes containing chlorine dioxide and polyhexanide are viable alternatives to chlorhexidine, since they reduce oral biofilm and have little or no reported side or adverse effects.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Chlorhexidine/adverse effects , Chlorine Compounds/pharmacology , Oxides , Biguanides/pharmacology
2.
Rev. estomatol. Hered ; 30(3): 201-206, jul-sep 2020. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1180917

ABSTRACT

RESUMO A odontodisplasia regional é uma anomalia dentária, pouco comum, não hereditária e com uma etiologia ainda desconhecida. Os tecidos afetados são o esmalte e a dentina, são acometidos nos dentes decíduos e, as vezes na dentição permanente de um mesmo indivíduo. Esta lesão pode ser confundida com outras lesões como por exemplo o odontoma ou dentes com outro tipo de anomalia. O objetivo é relatar um caso de odontodisplasia regional na dentição decídua e permanente de uma criança, assim como apresentar as diferentes ferramentas diagnósticas. Os dentes acometidos mostravam-se ao exame clínico, como dentes hipoplásicos com coloração amarelo amarronzado. Uma radiografia panorâmica e radiografias periapicais, assim como uma biopsia excisional, foram essenciais para obter um diagnóstico correto, e assim poder oferecer uma adequada conduta para a preservação e previsibilidade dos diferentes tipos de tratamentos reabilitadores odontológicos que essa criança poderia ter nos próximos anos até a idade adulta.


SUMMARY Regional odontodysplasia is an uncommon dental anomaly that is not hereditary and has a still unknown etiology. The affected tissues are enamel and dentin, the primary teeth are affected, and sometimes in the permanent dentition of the same individual. This lesion may be confused with other lesions such as odontoma or teeth with another type of anomaly. The objective is to report a case of regional odontodysplasia in the deciduous and permanent dentition of a child, as well as to present the different diagnostic tools. The affected teeth showed clinical examination, such as hypoplastic teeth with a yellow-brown coloration. A panoramic radiograph and periapical radiographs, as well as an excisional biopsy, were essential to obtain a correct diagnosis, so as to be able to offer an adequate conduct for the preservation and predictability of the different types of dental rehabilitation treatments that this child could have in the years to come adulthood.

3.
Fisioter. Mov. (Online) ; 33: e003320, 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1090397

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction: Temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) may have a major impact on quality of life. Objective: Thus, this integrative review assessed the impact of TMD on quality of life. Method: An electronic and manual search was conducted to identify studies that evaluated the impact of TMD on an individual's quality of life. After the inclusion and exclusion criteria were met, seven articles were included and evaluated according to the quality of evidence using the Newcastle-Ottawa assessment. Results: The selected studies used different instruments to diagnose temporomandibular joint disorders and measure the quality of life. Only three studies used the RDC/TMD. As for quality of life, the most used instrument was the SF-36, followed by Br-MPQ and WHOQOL-Bref. Conclusion: The findings show that there is a negative impact of temporomandibular dysfunction on quality of life, especially regarding its severity. However, further studies are needed to confirm these results.


Resumo Introdução: A disfunção temporomandibular (DTM) pode ter um grande impacto na qualidade de vida das pessoas. Objetivo: Esta revisão integrativa avaliou o impacto da DTM na qualidade de vida da população. Método: Uma busca eletrônica e manual foi realizada para identificar estudos que avaliaram o impacto da DTM na qualidade de vida. Após os critérios de inclusão e exclusão serem estabelecidos, seis artigos foram incluídos e avaliados de acordo com a qualidade de evidências utilizando o Newcastle-Ottawa. Resultados: Os estudos selecionados utilizaram instrumentos distintos para diagnóstico da DTM e da mensuração da qualidade de vida. Os instrumentos de diagnóstico de DTM foram o Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD), índice Anamnético de Fonseca, índice de Helkimo e índice Anamnético de Fonseca juntamente com RDC/TMD. Quanto à qualidade de vida, o instrumento mais utilizado foi o SF-36, seguido de Br-MPQ e WHOQOL-Bref. Conclusão: Os achados mostram que existe um impacto negativo da DTM na qualidade de vida, principalmente quanto a sua gravidade. Entretanto, futuras pesquisas são necessárias para confirmar esses resultados.


Resumen Introducción: La disfunción temporomandibular (DTM) puede tener un gran impacto en la calidad de vida de las personas. Objetivo: Esta revisión integrativa evaluó el impacto de la DTM en la calidad de vida de la población. Método: Se realizó una búsqueda electrónica y manual para encontrar estudios que evalúen el impacto de la DTM en la calidad de vida. Después de establecer los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, seis artículos fueron incluidos y evaluados según la calidad de evidencias utilizando la escala Newcastle - Ottawa. Resultados: Los estudios seleccionados utilizaron diversos instrumentos para el diagnóstico de la DTM y para medir la calidad de vida. Los instrumentos de diagnóstico de la DTM fueron Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD), índice Anamnésico simplificado de Fonseca, índice de Helkimo e índice Anamnésico simplificado de Fonseca con RDC/TMD. Respecto a la calidad de vida, el instrumento más utilizado fue el SF-36, seguido de Br-MPQ y WHOQOL-Bref. Conclusión: Los resultados mostraron que existe un impacto negativo de la disfunción temporomandibular en la calidad de vida, principalmente respecto a su gravedad. No obstante, futuras investigaciones son necesarias para confirmar esos resultados.


Subject(s)
Facial Pain , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders , Quality of Life , Indicators (Statistics)
4.
RFO UPF ; 24(3): 392-401, 2019. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1357697

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: avaliar a eficácia do levantamento do seio maxilar atraumático sem enxerto ósseo e a taxa de sobrevivência da instalação de implantes imediatos. Material e métodos: realizou-se uma estratégia de busca nas bases de dados Pubmed, Web of Science e Science Direct, obtendo 103 artigos, sendo selecionados 07 estudos publicados entre 2008 até 2019. Resultados: foram registrados 576 pacientes com idades entre 19 e 85 anos de idade, de ambos os sexos e 1,113 implantes instalados. Verificou-se uma taxa de sucesso e sobrevivência dos implantes de 96,6%, após um seguimento de 1 a 3 anos e houve um ganho ósseo de aproximadamente 3mm. Considerações finais: o levantamento de seio maxilar atraumático sem enxerto ósseo é eficaz para reabilitação de áreas edêntulas e mostra um bom resultado ao longo do tempo, com uma taxa média de sobrevivência dos implantes de 96,3%. Ainda faltam estudos para determinar qual tipo de implante é melhor para este tipo de técnica. (AU)


Objective: To assess the efficacy of atraumatic maxillary sinus augmentation without bone grafting and the survival rate of the immediate implant installation. Material and methods: A search strategy was performed the in Pubmed, Web of Science, and Science Direct databases, resulting in 103 articles from which seven studies published between 2008 and 2019 were selected. Results: 576 patients of both sexes, aged between 19 and 85 years, were registered, as well as 1,113 implants installed. There was a success rate and survival of implants of 96.6% after a follow-up of 1 to 3 years and there was a bone gain of approximately 3 mm. Final considerations: The atraumatic maxillary sinus augmentation without bone graft is effective to rehabilitate edentulous areas and shows a good outcome over time, with an average rate of implant survival 96.3%. Further studies are still required to determine which type of implant is best for this type of technique.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Sinus Floor Augmentation/methods , Alveolar Bone Loss/therapy , Jaw, Edentulous/therapy , Maxillary Sinus
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL